Close Menu
The Baylor Lariat
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Trending
    • SLIDESHOW: Baylor vs. Louisiana Tech
    • Bennett’s 4 touchdowns push Baylor past Louisiana Tech 36-19
    • Baylor’s defense slowed down in win over LA Tech
    • Last-second equalizer forces No. 12 Baylor soccer into draw with No. 9 West Virginia
    • Old Dominion brings bright lights, classic country to Foster Pavilion
    • No. 18 Baylor volleyball surges past UTEP behind 3rd set rally
    • Review: Lizzy McAlpine explores connection with ‘Angel’
    • Lariat TV News: September 18th, 2026
    • About us
      • Fall 2026 Staff Page
      • Copyright Information
    • Contact
      • Contact Information
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Subscribe to The Morning Buzz
      • Department of Student Media
    • Employment
    • PDF Archives
    • RSS Feeds
    Donate
    The Baylor LariatThe Baylor Lariat
    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz
    Sunday, September 20
    • News
      • State and National News
        • State
        • National
      • Politics
        • 2025 Inauguration Page
        • Election Page
      • Baylor News
      • Waco Updates
      • Campus and Waco Crime
    • Arts & Life
      • Wedding Edition 2025
      • What to Do in Waco
      • Campus Culture
      • Indy and Belle
      • Leisure and Travel
        • Leisure
        • Travel
          • Baylor in Ireland
      • Student Spotlight
      • Local Scene
        • Small Businesses
        • Social Media
      • Arts and Entertainment
        • Art
        • Fashion
        • Food
        • Literature
        • Music
        • Film and Television
    • Opinion
      • Editorials
      • Points of View
      • Lariat Letters
    • Sports
      • Football
      • Basketball
        • March Madness 2026
        • Men’s Basketball
        • Women’s Basketball
      • Soccer
      • Baseball
      • Softball
      • Volleyball
      • Equestrian
      • Cross Country and Track & Field
      • Acrobatics & Tumbling
      • Tennis
      • Golf
      • Pro Sports
      • Sports Takes
      • Club Sports
    • Lariat TV News
    • Multimedia
      • Video Features
      • Podcasts
        • Don’t Feed the Bears
        • Bear Newscessities
      • Slideshows
      • Online Packages
        • Homecoming 2025
        • Lariat 125
        • Sing 2026
    • Welcome Back 2026
    • Advertising
    The Baylor Lariat
    Home»Opinion»Editorials

    Editorial: Remedy for radical hate speech lies in truth, not suppression

    By March 16, 2011 Editorials No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Snyder v. Phelps involving Westboro Baptist Church has enraged many, but for others it proves that the foundations of the First Amendment cannot be shaken.

    Westboro Baptist Church, a radical self-proclaimed Christian group protests at military funerals, praising the death of soldiers. The church also protests against homosexuality and claims that God is punishing the United States for supporting homosexuals.

    The church members demonstrate at funerals across the country, picketing at least 1,000 feet from the funeral and on public property. The protesters carry hateful signs with proclamations like “Thank God for Dead Soldiers” across them.

    Albert Snyder, the father of Lance Cpl. Matthew A. Snyder, brought suit against Westboro for picketing at his son’s funeral.

    Although Snyder won the case in lower courts, it was eventually appealed to the Supreme Court which ruled in favor of Westboro, 8-1. The ruling was a major win for free speech proponents — firmly establishing that even inappropriate or offensive speech deserves protection under the First Amendment.

    The College Media Advisers’ 2011 spring college media convention at the Marriot Marquis Times Square invited Margie Phelps, attorney and daughter of Fred Phelps Sr., founder of Westboro Baptist Church, to speak Monday on the recent ruling and the First Amendment.

    Margie Phelps discussed the importance of free speech and stated emphatically that the government cannot — and should not — dictate what people should or should not talk about. It is true that this protection of speech — even the most unsavory of speech — is vital to the continuation of a democratic government.

    Without the ability to speak and publish on controversial topics, the United States would cease to exist as a free democracy.

    The power of the press lies in the First Amendment and the power of democracy relies heavily on the ability to check and balance every aspect of the government.

    Westboro’s treatment of soldiers and their families’, however, is more than disrespectful — it is unchristian. Westboro is refusing to acknowledge that the only reason they have been granted the freedom to protest at a soldier’s funeral is because that soldier, as well as thousands before him
    or her, laid their life down for liberty and freedom in America.

    The hypocrisy that runs rampant in the group that has the right to spew hatred solely because of the democracy secured by the people it insults is sickening. But there is hope.

    Chief Justice Roberts of the Supreme Court encourages states to pass laws that will create a buffer zone around funerals—thereby not limiting free speech but still protecting the funeral-goers from obscene behavior.

    This type of law is the best legal solution since punishing Westboro members for their speech would open the door to government control and censorship.

    The buffer zone would not limit speech, but merely change the location where speech is possible.

    The media convention earlier this week is just a further testament to how important this case has been to journalism and free speech, and it is also a testament to how controversial the case is across the nation.

    The shocking statements that come from Westboro normally warrant generous press time. But, just as they have the right to speak, we have the right to ignore. Whether or not you agree with the mission of Westboro and how they carry it out is not the issue.

    In fact, disagreeing with them furthers the free speech process and allows the country to grow and unite under free speech.

    We can’t suspend the protection of Westboro’s speech because that would hinder our ability to fight their anti-Gospel rhetoric.

    Westboro Baptist Church has a mission that is antithetical to the teachings of Jesus Christ.

    We must use every avenue — including the written and spoken word — to triumph over the misguided lies of this organization.

    As a Christian community, we must realize that democracy, however great it may be, doesn’t trump the love and grace of Christ.

    The people of Westboro Baptist Church are lost — perhaps we can use Scripture and true faith to show the world the true beauty of Christ. We shouldn’t, however, suspend First Amendment rights to do so.

    Fred Phelps Supreme Court Westboro Baptist Church

    Keep Reading

    Gen Z has lost the art of learning

    Democracy is not a spectator sport; get involved, pay attention

    Reduce suicide’s stigma, not its severity

    We’ve lost the plot of “What Would Jesus Do?”

    Being political means more than holding up a sign

    Big brother is watching: Resist Flock cameras

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • SLIDESHOW: Baylor vs. Louisiana Tech September 19, 2026
    • Bennett’s 4 touchdowns push Baylor past Louisiana Tech 36-19 September 19, 2026
    About

    The award-winning student newspaper of Baylor University since 1900.

    Articles, photos, and other works by staff of The Baylor Lariat are Copyright © Baylor® University. All rights reserved.

    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz

    Get the latest Lariat News by just Clicking Subscribe!

    Follow the Live Coverage
    Tweets by @bulariat

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    • Featured
    • News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Arts and Life
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.