Close Menu
The Baylor Lariat
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Trending
    • Texas primary candidates discuss AI, property taxes, economy before election
    • Young team, big goals: Baylor Society of Automative Engineers to compete in national competition
    • Englishman goes viral for Texas facts
    • Texas expands school choice, professors weigh impact
    • 100-year-old Baylor alumna shares family story, legacy
    • Baylor School of Music alumnus conducts 2026 NFL halftime show
    • ‘Technology and the Human Person in the Age of AI’ conference to bring conversation, diversity to campus
    • No. 15 Baylor WBB throttled by No. 20 Texas Tech in 87-56 road loss
    • About us
      • Fall 2025 Staff Page
      • Copyright Information
    • Contact
      • Contact Information
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Subscribe to The Morning Buzz
      • Department of Student Media
    • Employment
    • PDF Archives
    • RSS Feeds
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    The Baylor LariatThe Baylor Lariat
    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz
    Thursday, February 19
    • News
      • State and National News
        • State
        • National
      • Politics
        • 2025 Inauguration Page
        • Election Page
      • Homecoming 2025
      • Baylor News
      • Waco Updates
      • Campus and Waco Crime
    • Arts & Life
      • Wedding Edition 2025
      • What to Do in Waco
      • Campus Culture
      • Indy and Belle
      • Sing 2025
      • Leisure and Travel
        • Leisure
        • Travel
          • Baylor in Ireland
      • Student Spotlight
      • Local Scene
        • Small Businesses
        • Social Media
      • Arts and Entertainment
        • Art
        • Fashion
        • Food
        • Literature
        • Music
        • Film and Television
    • Opinion
      • Editorials
      • Points of View
      • Lariat Letters
    • Sports
      • March Madness 2025
      • Football
      • Basketball
        • Men’s Basketball
        • Women’s Basketball
      • Soccer
      • Baseball
      • Softball
      • Volleyball
      • Equestrian
      • Cross Country and Track & Field
      • Acrobatics & Tumbling
      • Tennis
      • Golf
      • Pro Sports
      • Sports Takes
      • Club Sports
    • Lariat TV News
    • Multimedia
      • Video Features
      • Podcasts
        • Don’t Feed the Bears
        • Bear Newscessities
      • Slideshows
    • Housing 2026
    • Lariat 125
    • Advertising
    The Baylor Lariat
    Home»Opinion»Points of View

    Viewpoint: Young Americans must abolish military draft

    By February 29, 2012 Points of View No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.”
    — Wendell Phillips, 19th century abolitionist

    My great worry is my generation is not vigilant enough. By that I mean we haven’t given enough thought to ideas that potentially threaten our ways of life, and thus we leave the door open to political exploitation.

    Perhaps the greatest threat to any group of young Americans in the modern age is the institution of a military draft, which would compel millions of people to risk their lives against their own wills for the benefit of those wielding political power.

    Although today’s military is staffed by voluntary employees, young men are well aware this could change at a moment’s notice. At the age of 18, every American male is required to register with the U.S. Selective Service System, which holds on file the names of more than 15 million people in case Congress should choose to reinstate the draft and conscript them into service.

    We are told it is our civic duty to register, merely one of the many necessary inconveniences of adulthood. We are assured conscription would only be used as a last resort when the volunteer military is insufficient.

    In reality, the registration list makes it dangerously convenient for Congress to jeopardize the lives of innocent American citizens and disrupt their careers, relationships and personal ambitions.

    Imagine the public reaction if the state had a registry of a carefully selected class of individuals who could be forced to uproot their careers and families and work as field-hands in the event of a massive increase in the demand for farm crops. Does this registry serve as anything but a means to enable the state to institutionalize slavery in the future?

    I know some would respond that slaves historically did not receive payment for their work while conscripted soldiers have, but what does that matter? Would slaves in the 19th century have been any less enslaved if they received paychecks but were still forced to labor under the whip of their masters?

    Let’s not be mistaken: Good things don’t happen to soldiers who refuse to serve or attempt to escape during wartime.

    Despite the diversity of political viewpoints in America throughout its history, people are never more prone to abandon their convictions and fall in line with government propaganda than they are during wartime. This propaganda typically takes the form of fear-driven campaigns that equate all forms of support for the military apparatus with freedom, liberty and security.

    If we are to avoid the mistakes of the past and summon sufficient political pressure to prevent the institution of another draft, we have to convince this generation that military conscription isn’t just an inconvenience or a “necessary evil,” but a wrong.

    We are not the property of the state. We are not simply capital to be expended at the whim of politicians and military commanders. We should categorically reject a policy of kidnapping young people and forcing them into the involuntary servitude of a political state that claims to be protecting them.

    Although freedom from a draft will never be completely secure, there are steps our generation should take to minimize the future risk of conscription.

    In the short run, we should call for the abolition of the Selective Service System and its full registry, which serves as the sole great enabler of government conscription.

    In the long run, we should remain vigilant and willing to apply peaceful political pressure in opposition to military draft proposals. We can’t afford to wait until a congressional declaration of war to make up our minds on the issue, because we can’t afford to fall in line when the time comes to debate the draft.

    Daniel Houston is a senior journalism and philosophy major from Fort Worth and is a staff writer for the Lariat.

    Congress Selective Service System

    Keep Reading

    To fight imposter syndrome, shift your perspective

    There and back again: The spiritual trials throughout my faith journey

    Already failed your New Year’s resolution?

    What are college students really paying for?

    Permit yourself, others to do new things imperfectly

    Don’t let the curtain fall: The case for keeping movie theaters alive

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • Texas primary candidates discuss AI, property taxes, economy before election February 19, 2026
    • Young team, big goals: Baylor Society of Automative Engineers to compete in national competition February 18, 2026
    About

    The award-winning student newspaper of Baylor University since 1900.

    Articles, photos, and other works by staff of The Baylor Lariat are Copyright © Baylor® University. All rights reserved.

    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz

    Get the latest Lariat News by just Clicking Subscribe!

    Follow the Live Coverage
    Tweets by @bulariat

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    • Featured
    • News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Arts and Life
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Insert/edit link

    Enter the destination URL

    Or link to existing content

      No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.