Close Menu
The Baylor Lariat
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    Trending
    • Review: Doja Cat takes on new form in ‘Vie’
    • The cost of fame is too high for fans to bear
    • A&L Tunesday: Sept. 30
    • It’s OK to not be the smartest person in the room
    • Puppet show comes to Mayborn at weekly Mini Monday Story Time
    • Mayborn Museum celebrates Hispanic Heritage Month through ‘Ofrenda’
    • Walking tour takes Hispanic history to the streets
    • Baylor New Play Initiative showcases new voices in theatre
    • About us
      • Fall 2025 Staff Page
      • Copyright Information
    • Contact
      • Contact Information
      • Letters to the Editor
      • Subscribe to The Morning Buzz
      • Department of Student Media
    • Employment
    • PDF Archives
    • RSS Feeds
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    The Baylor LariatThe Baylor Lariat
    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz
    Tuesday, September 30
    • News
      • State and National News
        • State
        • National
      • Politics
        • 2025 Inauguration Page
        • Election Page
      • Homecoming Page
      • Baylor News
      • Waco Updates
      • Campus and Waco Crime
    • Arts & Life
      • Wedding Edition 2025
      • What to Do in Waco
      • Campus Culture
      • Indy and Belle
      • Sing 2025
      • Leisure and Travel
        • Leisure
        • Travel
          • Baylor in Ireland
      • Student Spotlight
      • Local Scene
        • Small Businesses
        • Social Media
      • Arts and Entertainment
        • Art
        • Fashion
        • Food
        • Literature
        • Music
        • Film and Television
    • Opinion
      • Editorials
      • Points of View
      • Lariat Letters
    • Sports
      • March Madness 2025
      • Football
      • Basketball
        • Men’s Basketball
        • Women’s Basketball
      • Soccer
      • Baseball
      • Softball
      • Volleyball
      • Equestrian
      • Cross Country and Track & Field
      • Acrobatics & Tumbling
      • Tennis
      • Golf
      • Pro Sports
      • Sports Takes
      • Club Sports
    • Lariat TV News
    • Multimedia
      • Video Features
      • Podcasts
        • Don’t Feed the Bears
      • Slideshows
    • Advertising
    The Baylor Lariat
    Home»Opinion»Editorials

    Editorial: Oh, Snap! Pictures on Snapchat don’t go away

    webmasterBy webmasterSeptember 17, 2013 Editorials No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    SnapchatEditorialComic.jpgPose, snap, send for 10 seconds, destroy. That is the beauty of Snapchat, right?

    Wrong. Whatever happens on Snapchat stays in the public realm of online information. Snapchat, the two-year-old app that markets itself as one of the fastest, most private photo and video sharing outlets available, warns users not to “use Snapchat to send messages if you want to be certain that the recipient cannot keep a copy.”

    We all know about the screenshot feature, which sends the user a notification when the snap recipient makes a copy of the vanishing photo. This was thought to deter recipients from keeping the photos which were meant to be destroyed, and it did for the most part because no guy wants to have to deal with the wrath of a girl who just found out her intended private photo was saved as a prize to show his buddies.

    It didn’t take long for users to figure out that it took nothing more than changing the default screenshot trigger on your phone for the Snapchat app not to recognize the screenshot. After this revelation, multiple Facebook pages and websites, such as Snapchatleaked.com, were created, putting all of these intended private moments into a very public realm. Some Snapchatters were humiliated while others were amused. Regardless, each user was banking the privacy of his or her intimate or embarrassing moments on the trust of the recipient.

    This particular website was live for less than 24 hours before it crashed because of the flood of traffic it received.

    A Facebook page that went live at noon on Sunday called Best Snapchat Screenshots garnered 72,854 likes by 5 p.m. Upon doing a simple Facebook search of Snapchat Leaked, you will find at least eight pages without having to even finish typing the subject title.

    All of these online media outlets prove that many recipients don’t respect or value the trust that the sender places in them and that people are hungry for the most embarrassingly private moments they can find. For some reason, even these public privacy infringements do not seem to encourage many people to censor themselves in their Snaps.

    Aside from simply taking a screenshot in the 10 seconds or less a recipient has to view a photo, as of May, Snaps can now be recovered once they are sent and deleted. Despite Snaptchat’s previous claims that photos cannot be restored, Richard Hickman of Decipher Forensics found that it was possible to pull Snapchat photos from the data of the device used to take them. Rather than truly deleting photos, the Snapchat software affixes the extension .NOMEDIA to the file, which is stored in the memory of the device. While this method does make the media unviewable, to see it again one simply has to extract the file from the device and remove the .NONMEDIA from the name. A simple Google search proves that this is easy as pie.

    Because of this ability to infringe on a person’s privacy, despite Snapchat’s previous claims and misleading ads that imply it is not possible, the Electronic Privacy Information Center filed a complaint with the Federal Trade commission on May 9, saying that Snapchat is deceiving its customers.

    While it may be frustrating that nothing is truly private, we were happy to hear that since the EPIC complaint law enforcement officials have been looking into concerns about Snapchat being a platform for underage ‘sexting.’

    While the sender is ultimately responsible for all content exchanged through the app, because the target demographic is users from 13 to 23 years old, Snapchat should be more open about the fact that there is no way to protect any content that is shared.

    Snapchat has recently taken steps to protect its underage users. In June 2013, Snapchat Inc. released an app called Snapkidz for users under 13 years old, which allows them to take Snaps and draw on them but not to send them to others, although they can be saved locally to their device and sent outside of the app.

    Just as it is on Facebook, Twitter and all other social networking sites, things on Snapchat are not kept secret. There is no definitive way to protect the privacy of the content that is shared.

    Some Snapchat correspondence is nothing more than innocent fun, but we caution people to be conservative when sending Snaps. As far as what we define as conservative, if you would not be OK with it showing up on your Facebook wall, don’t send it. It’s as simple as that.

    privacy Snapchat
    webmaster

    Keep Reading

    The cost of fame is too high for fans to bear

    It’s OK to not be the smartest person in the room

    ‘Baby fever’ is trending, but preparedness isn’t

    Minimalism is killing creativity

    Tomorrow is not promised, today is

    Be a good Baylor Bear, think before you type

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Recent Posts
    • Review: Doja Cat takes on new form in ‘Vie’ September 30, 2025
    • The cost of fame is too high for fans to bear September 29, 2025
    About

    The award-winning student newspaper of Baylor University since 1900.

    Articles, photos, and other works by staff of The Baylor Lariat are Copyright © Baylor® University. All rights reserved.

    Subscribe to the Morning Buzz

    Get the latest Lariat News by just Clicking Subscribe!

    Follow the Live Coverage
    Tweets by @bulariat

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
    • Featured
    • News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Arts and Life
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.